Part 4: Appendices¶
These appendices are Part 4 of 4 of the The Error Monad tutorial.
In depth discussion: what even is a monad?¶
This tutorial has been pretty loose with the word monad. It has focused on usage with very little explanations of fundamental concepts. It is focused on the surface syntax instead of the underlying mathematical model. This section goes into a bit more details about the general principles of monads and such. It does not claim to even attempt to give a complete description of monads, it simply gives more details than the previous sections.
For coding purposes, a monad is a parametric type equipped with a set of specific operators.
type 'a t
val bind : 'a t > ('a > 'b t) > 'b t
val return : 'a > 'a t
The return
operator injects a value into the monad and the bind
operator continues within the monad.
The set of operators must also follow the monad laws. For example
bind (return x) f
must be equivalent to f x
.
Monads are used as a generic way to encode different abstractions within
a programming language: I/O, errors, collections, etc. For example, the
option
monad is defined as
module OptionMonad = struct
type 'a t = 'a option
let bind x f = match x with  None > None  Some x > f x
let return x = Some x
end
And it is useful when dealing with queries that may have no answer. This
can be used as a lighter form of error management than the result
monad.
Some programming languages also offer syntactic sugar for monads. This
is to avoid having to write bind
within bind
within bind
.
E.g., Haskell relies heavily on monads and has the dedicated
do
notation. In OCaml, you can use one of the following methods:
binding operators (since OCaml 4.08.0)
let add x y = let ( let* ) = OptionMonad.bind in let* x = int_of_string_opt x in let* y = int_of_string_opt y in Some (string_of_int (x + y))

let add x y = let ( >>= ) = OptionMonad.bind in int_of_string_opt x >>= fun x > int_of_string_opt y >>= fun y > Some (string_of_int (x + y))
Note that mixing multiple infix operators is not always easy because of precedence and associativity.
partial application and infix
@@
let add x y = OptionMonad.bind (int_of_string_opt x) @@ fun x > OptionMonad.bind (int_of_string_opt y) @@ fun y > Some (string_of_int (x + y))
This is useful for the occasional application: you do not need to declare a dedicated operator nor open a dedicated syntax module.
Monads can have additional operators beside the required core. E.g., you
can add OptionMonad.join : 'a option option > 'a option
.
In depth discussion: Error_monad
, src/lib_error_monad/
, Tezos_base__TzPervasives
, etc.¶
The different parts of the error monad (syntax modules, extended stdlib, tracing primitives, etc.) are defined in separate files. Yet, they are all available to you directly. This section explains where each part is defined and how it reaches the scope of your code.
From your code, working back to the definitions.
In most of Octez, the Error_monad
module is available. Specifically, it is
available in all the packages that depend on tezosbase
. This covers
everything except the protocols and a handful of lowlevel libraries.
In those part of Octez, the build files include
open Tezos_base__TzPervasives
.
The module Tezos_base__TzPervasives
is defined by the compilation
unit src/lib_base/TzPervasives.ml
.
This compilation unit gathers multiple lowlevel modules together. Of
interest to us is include Tezos_error_monad.Error_monad
(left
untouched in the mli
) and include Tezos_error_monad.TzLwtreslib
(not present in the mli
, used to shadow the Stdlib modules List
,
Option
, Result
, etc.).
The Error_monad
module exports:
the
error
type along with theregister_error_kind
function,the
'a tzresult
type,the
TzTrace
module,the
Result_syntax
andLwt_result_syntax
modules (from a different, more generic name),and exports a few more functions.
The rest of the tezoserrormonad
package:
defines the
'a trace
type (inTzTrace.ml
), andinstantiates
TzLwtreslib
by applyingLwtreslib
’sTraced
functor toTzTrace
.
The Lwtreslib
module exports a Traced (T: TRACE)
functor. This
functor takes a definition of traces and returns a group of modules
intended to shadow the Stdlib.
From the underlying definitions, working all the way up to your code.
At the lowlevel is Lwtreslib.
src/lib_lwt_result_stdlib/bare/sigs
: defines interfaces for basic, nontraced syntax modules and Stdlibreplacement modules.src/lib_lwt_result_stdlib/bare/structs
: defines implementations basic, nontraced syntax modules and Stdlibreplacement modules.src/lib_lwt_result_stdlib/traced/sigs
: defines interfaces for traced syntax modules and Stdlibreplacement modules. These interfaces are built on top of the nontraced interfaces, mostly by addition and occasionally by shadowing.src/lib_lwt_result_stdlib/traced/structs
: defines implementations for traced syntax modules and Stdlibreplacement modules. These implementations are built on top of the nontraced implementations, mostly by addition and occasionally by shadowing. These are defined as functors over some abstract tracing primitives.src/lib_lwt_result_stdlib/lwtreslib.mli
: puts together the traced implementations into a single functorTraced
that takes a trace definition and returns fully instantiated modules to shadow the Stdlib.
Above Lwtreslib is the Error monad.
src/lib_error_monad/TzTrace.ml
: defines the'a trace
type along with the lowlevel traceconstruction primitives.src/lib_error_monad/TzLwtreslib.ml
: instantiatesLwtreslib.Traced
withTzTrace
.src/lib_error_monad/monad_extension_maker.ml
: provides a functor which, given a tracing module, provides some higher level functions for tracing as well as a few other functions.src/lib_error_monad/core_maker.ml
: provides a functor which, given a name, provides anerror
type, aregister_error_kind
function, and a few other related functions. This is a functor so we can instantiate it separately for the shell and for each of the protocols.src/lib_error_monad/TzCore.ml
: instantiates thecore_maker
functor for the shell.src/lib_error_monad/error_monad.ml
: puts together all of the above into a single module.
Above the Error monad is libbase:
src/lib_base/TzPervasives.ml
: exports theError_monad
module, includes theError_monad
module, exports each of theTzLwtreslib
module.
In depth discussion: result
as data and result
as controlflow¶
Note that result
(and similarly, tzresult
) is a data type.
Specifically
type ('a, 'b) result =
 Ok of 'a
 Error of 'b
You can treat values of type result
as data of that datatype. In
this case, you construct and match the values, you pass them around,
etc.
Note however that, in Octez, we also use the result
type as a
controlflow mechanism. Specifically, in conjunction with the let*
binding operator, the result
type has a continue/abort meaning.
Within your code, you can go from one use to the other. E.g.,
let xs =
List.rev_map
(fun x >
(* [result] as controlflow *)
let open Result_syntax in
let* .. = .. in
let* .. = .. in
return ..)
ys
in
let successes xs =
(* [result] as data *)
List.length (List.rev_filter_ok xs)
in
..
Using result
as sometimes data and sometimes controlflow is the
main reason to bend the guidelines about which syntax module to
open. E.g., if your function returns (_, _) result Lwt.t
but the
result
is data returned by the function rather than controlflow
used within the function, then you should open Lwt_syntax
(rather
then Lwt_result_syntax
).
As a significant aside, note that in OCaml you can also use exceptions
for controlflow (with raise
and try
with
and
match
with
exception
) and as data (the type exn
is an
extensible variant datatype).
(** [iter_no_raise f xs] applies [f] to all the elements of [xs]. If [f] raises
an exception, the iteration continues and [f] is still applies to other
elements. The function returns pairs of the exceptions raised by [f] along
the elements of [xs] that triggered these exceptions. *)
let iter_no_raise f xs =
List.fold_left
(fun excs x >
match f x with
 exception exc > exc :: excs
 () > excs)
[]
xs
You can find uses of exception as data within the error monad itself.
First, the generic failure functions (error_with
,
error_with_exn
, failwith
, and fail_with_exn
) are just
wrapper around an error
which carries an exception (as data).
Second, Lwtreslib provides helpers to catch exceptions. E.g.,
Result.catch : (unit > 'a) > ('a, exn) result
calls a function and
wraps any raised exception inside an Error
constructor.
In depth discussion: pros and cons of result
compared to other error management techniques¶
In Octez, we use result
and the specialised tzresult
. For this
reason, this tutorial is focused on result
/tzresult
. However,
there are other techniques for handling errors. This section compares
them briefly.
In general you should use result
and tzresult
but in some
specific cases you can deviate from that. The comparisons below may help
you decide.
Exceptions
In exceptionbased error handling, you raise an exception (via
raise
) when an error occurs and you catch it (via try
with
)
to recover. Exceptions are fast because the OCaml compiler and runtime
provide the necessary mechanisms directly.
Whether a function can raise an exception or not cannot be determined by its type. This means that it is easy to forget to recover from an exception. An external library may change the set of exceptions that a function raises and you need to update calls to this function, but the typechecker cannot warn you about it. This places a heavy burden on the developer who is responsible for checking the documentation of all the functions they call.
Exceptionraising functions should be documented as such using the
@raise
documentation keyword.
Note that within the protocol, you should not use exceptions at all.
tzresult
With tzresult
, errors are carried by the Error
constructor of a
result
. In this way an 'a tzresult
represents the result of a
computation that normally returns an 'a
but may fail.
Because the type of errors is an abstract wrapper (trace
) around an
extensible variant (error
), you can only recover from these errors
in a generic way.
result
With result
, errors are carried by the Error
constructor. Each
function defines its own type of errors.
and*
is unusable.option
With option
, errors are represented by the None
constructor.
Errors are completely void of payload.
Because there are no payloads attached to an error, you should generally treat the error directly at the call site. Otherwise you might lose track of the origin of the failure. E.g., what was not found in the following code fragment?
match
let open Option_syntax in
let* z = find "zero" in
let* o = find "one" in
Some (z, o)
with
 None > ..
 Some (z, o) > ..
Option is a common enough strategy that the Option_syntax
and
Lwt_option_syntax
modules are available in the Octez source.
fallback
Another approach to errors is to have a default or fallback value. In that case, the function returns a default sensible value when it would raise and exception or return an error. Alternatively, it can take this fallback value as parameter.
(** @raise Not_found if argument is [None] *)
val get : 'a option > 'a
(** returns [default] if argument is [None] *)
val value : default:'a > 'a option > 'a
Legacy code¶
The codebase contains only let
style binding operators. However,
you might encounter infix bindings in older protocols. If you do and
you are unsure about what the many infix operators do, read on.
The legacy code is written with infix bindings instead of let
style
binding operators. The binding >>?
for result
and tzresult
,
>>=
for Lwt, and >>=?
for Lwtresult
and Lwttzresult
. A
full equivalence table follows.
Modern 
Legacy 
let open Result_syntax in
let* x = e in
e'

e >>? fun x >
e'

let open Result_syntax in
let+ x = e in
e'

e >? fun x >
e'

let open Lwt_syntax in
let* x = e in
e'

e >>= fun x >
e'

let open Lwt_syntax in
let+ x = e in
e'

e >= fun x >
e'

let open Lwt_result_syntax in
let* x = e in
e'

e >>=? fun x >
e'

let open Lwt_result_syntax in
let+ x = e in
e'

e >=? fun x >
e'


No equivalent, uses

let open Lwt_result_syntax in
let*! x = e in
e'

(e >>= ok) >>=? fun x >
e'

let open Lwt_result_syntax in
let*? x = e in
e'

e >>?= fun x >
e'

In addition, instead of dedicated return
and fail
functions from
a given syntax module, the legacy code relied on global values.
Modern 
Legacy 
let open Result_syntax in
return x

ok x

let open Result_syntax in
fail e

No equivalent, uses

let open Lwt_syntax in
return x

No equivalent, uses

let open Lwt_result_syntax in
return x

return x

let open Lwt_result_syntax in
fail e

No equivalent, uses

let open Result_syntax in
return x

ok x

let open Result_syntax in
tzfail e

error e

let open Lwt_result_syntax in
return x

return x

let open Lwt_result_syntax in
tzfail e

fail e

In addition to these syntactic differences, there are also usage differences. You might encounter the following patterns which you should not repeat:
Matching against a trace:
match f () with  Ok .. > ..  Error (Timeout :: _) > ..  Error trace > ..
This is discouraged because the compiler is unable to warn you if the matching is affected by a change in the code. E.g., if you add context to an error in one place in the code, you may change the result of the matching somewhere else in the code.